Best typist in each language

Various rankings specific to 10FF.
User avatar
Linsk
Posts: 1002
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Best typist in each language

Post by Linsk » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:58 pm

I think the way I'm typing in Korean is the most common input method for this country. This can easily be verified over the internet. And I type Japanese like in the video that you found. I think it's the most common input method too.

But counting the number of keystrokes in Japanese is a little more complicated than in Korean. Because in Korean you simply type the right keys in succession to form each character of a word and then type space (only once) to move to the next word. While in Japanese you have to type the right characters of the word, then choose the right form with space, then confirm with the enter key, and finally type again the enter key to go to the next word. So most of the time you need 3 keystrokes just to move from word to word.

And that's not all: some words appear directly with their good form, so you don't need to press space for them. Also, if you use Firefox, typing the enter key will both confirm and move to the next word at the same time, so you need to type it only once (instead of 2 on Chrome or Opera).

So in the end, the number of keystrokes to go to the next word can vary (depending on the word and your browser) between 1 and 3 or more keystrokes (also because sometimes you have to press more than once on space to get the right form of the word, although once is usually sufficient).

User avatar
Linsk
Posts: 1002
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Best typist in each language

Post by Linsk » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:47 pm

Update

Gold medal count added.

Normal mode: Bulgarian, Croatian, Danish, Esperanto, Finnish, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Macedonian (added), Malagasy (added), Norwegian, Serbian, Slovak, Swedish, Ukrainian (added), Urdu

Advanced mode: Czech, Dutch, Finnish, Galician, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese (added), Norwegian, Swedish, Turkish, Vietnamese

qbZ
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:46 pm

Re: Best typist in each language

Post by qbZ » Wed Apr 06, 2016 12:33 pm

<deleted>
Last edited by qbZ on Sat Apr 11, 2020 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Linsk
Posts: 1002
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Best typist in each language

Post by Linsk » Sat Apr 09, 2016 5:48 pm

Updated.

SlowMotion
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:22 pm

Re: Best typist in each language

Post by SlowMotion » Tue May 10, 2016 10:39 pm

Nihad, serbian (188) and indonesian (176)

http://10fastfingers.com/user/35196/

AndreaAk
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 6:43 pm

Re: Best typist in each language

Post by AndreaAk » Sat Aug 13, 2016 6:45 pm

Andrea Senza Cognome: 175 wpm in italian [873 cpm]
My 10fastfingers profile: https://10fastfingers.com/user/330203/

VinceMiller
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:12 pm

Re: Best typist in each language

Post by VinceMiller » Fri Oct 28, 2016 5:50 am

Update on Simplified Chinese
220 WPM - 1100 CPM - 85 typed words [Simplified Chinese]
http://10fastfingers.com/user/195674/ :roll:

VinceMiller
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:12 pm

Re: Best typist in each language

Post by VinceMiller » Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:36 am

239 WPM - 1197 CPM - 96 typed words [Simplified Chinese] VinceMiller lang.

232 WPM video proof --- www.youtube.com/watch?v=hv7yhj9iYAc

PD: I've already noticed that Linsk has been absent for a long time which means the ranking hasn't been updated for quite a bit haha :roll: :cry:

viper.khadem
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:40 am
Location: Iran

Re: Best typist in each language

Post by viper.khadem » Fri Jan 13, 2017 2:35 pm

Attachments
Chart.jpg
Chart.jpg (93.11 KiB) Viewed 32991 times

gabrielsebben

Re: Best typist in each language

Post by gabrielsebben » Wed Jan 25, 2017 12:19 am

Galician advanced mode: 151wpm! (+3wpm) :P
Attachments
galicianadvancedtest2.png
galicianadvancedtest2.png (191.03 KiB) Viewed 32807 times

Post Reply