words per minute
8
Shivamsoni1369517
00:00
Speed
Owing to the nature of challenge made in the present application, it is found that issuance of notice to the respondents No.3 to 6 is not necessary as they are not a necessary party in the present matter and, as such, they will not be prejudiced in any manner by any order that may be passed in their absence. Hence, notice upon them is dispensed with. 4. The respondents No 1 and 2 in the present application are the plaintiffs in T.S. No. 351/2015. The suit was filed for declaration, rendition of account and for partition. In the said suit, the prayer was made for declaration that the respondents No. 1 and 2 herein are the co-owners of the property described in the Schedule-A along with the two stored RCC building standing thereon and for a further declaration that the respondents No. 1 and 2 are each entitled to 2/3rd share (residual) of the said Schedule-A property along with the two stored RCC building standing thereon as well as for relief of partition and for permanent injunction.