words per minute
9
KAUSHALGHAZIPUR
00:00
Speed
This summer the global acaeme has celebrated, with much flourish, the 150tht birth anniversary of Sigmund Freud, one of the four eponymous individuals who have defined the dominant world image I our times-the others being Darwin, Marx and Einstein. It is surprising therefore that the huge mass of writings published on the occasion, by some of the best known academics and Freud scholars, had turned out to be a tame affair, perhaps aspects of Freud’s worldview have become so much a part of our life that his capacity to shock ahs now declined, perhaps the academics and the universities so thoroughly dominate the intellectual domain in the west that debates on the Freudian heritage have mostly centered on the gradual exit of psychoanalysis from medical schools, its triumphant entry into literary theory and cultural studies, and its new love affair with film studies and popular culture. Certainly I have not see many serious efforts this summer to grapple with the larger global significance of psychoanalysic and its fate outside North and West Europe. Those who try to deploy Freud’s thought and method to map human subjectivities outside the west are likely to have other reasons for finding the Summer’s fare insipid. Looking back on the last 50 years, perhaps the most significant new contribution of applied psychoanalysis has been to wares our under understanding of human violence. When Freud’s interpretation of Dress heralded the beginning of the age of Homo Psychologicus, it was the theory of psychosexuality that provoked most controversy. In the post World War IIera, the focus has shifted to violence. In the African and Asian colonies, this change took place much earlier. In India, despite the fond belief of many, the theory of psychosexuality has never aroused the anxiety that it did in fin-de-siecle Vienna or Dewardian England. Not even when psychoanalysis first came to India in the 191-s. Puritanism was not unknown to India, but its main bastion was the urban middle class. Even there, few found Freud’s emphasis on sexuality more left-handed religious practices and thought. Indians in diaspora, perennially waiting to be shocked y the irreverence of psychoanalysis, will be very hurt that, in India, the first generation of applied psychoanalysts did not consider very many things sacred enough to be outside the preview of their discipline. Their readers were not offended by their audacity either in the 1930s was published the first psychoanalytic essay on Tagore, all ready India’s national poet and deified as a timeless genius. NO-body was embarrassed, not even Tagore himself.