words per minute
24
SUNIL_BEELIYA
00:00
Speed
present petition under Article Constitution aggrieved orderdated (Annexure) Additional District Judge District Civilappeal Judicial Magistrate respondent application Succession hereinafter referred aforesaid petitioner succession certificate dismissed appellate Thereafter under Article 227 maintainability objection proceedings revisable amenable revisional jurisdiction Allahabad Jupiter Succession Judicial Magistrate respondent regard similitude controversy question analogously conveniences narrated procedure defendant rejected property consisting agricultural bearing referred purchased mutated respondent borrowed treatment document transfer permanent injunction executed favour strength registered learned respondent’s defendants appreciate proceedings erroneously submitted Court has directed exercising the powers under Section directing consolidation of hearing Hence, the impugned trial Court illegal and liable judgment passed by the Court After rejection of the application under Section 10 of CPC dated 28.06.2018, Learned counsel for the respondent illegality or irregularities consolidate both the suits perused the records as the orders passed directly and substantially itigating, then the subsequent njunction and to restrain dispossession RCS No.26-A/2017 previously instituted suit subsequently instituted possession of suit property. permanent injunction against the defendants consolidated common judgment Madhya Pradesh appellant- accused Gangadeen order sheet dated appears pendency dismissed as abated convenience consideration Criminal Appeals preferred against the judgment of conviction Additional Sessions Judge sentence been convicted and sentenced for the following offences complainant denied the same accused persons returned inflicted injury dmitted fact that complainant party and accused persons were knowing each other prior to the incident. After the incident, the complainant party reached the Police Station Ambah by bringing the injured witnesses and postmortem of dead body of deceased along with application Accused persons pleaded not guilty and claimed to be triedMohkam Singh (PW7) marshalling the evidence available on record, found appellants Challenging the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence, it is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the appellants- accused that the trial Court has erred in considering the evidence produced before it as there were various contradictions and omissions in the evidence of prosecution witnesses. It is further submitted that the witnesses are relative of the deceased and they are interested witnesses and, therefore, their evidence is not reliable. Further, prosecution evidence does not support medical evidence. Even, there is nothing.