words per minute
3
IT_Legends
00:00
Speed
The is the family suit, therefore, the provision of Code of Civil procedure are not applicable strict senso. I, therefore, hold that the second suit was not barred. I have also heard the learned counsel for the respondents, how have filed separate petitions (being decided through this respondents were liable to be dismissed single judgment . The suit respondents were liable to be decreed as prayed.
14. The learned counsel for the parties, have not been able to convince me that the learned subordinate courts have, in any manner , exceeded their jurisdiction, committed in the in the in the . Any illegality or material irregularity in arriving at their conclusion. Consequently, there while upholding the judgment and decree of the learned first appellate court, these petitioner are found to be without merit are accordingly dismissed.
13. As far as the earlier suit filed on behalf of the minor is concerned, it has been pointed out that the same had been decree and a sum of Rs, 400 was directed to be paid by way of maintenance o to the minor. It has been argued that to said suit constituted a bar against filing of the subsequent suit. I am afraid , I do not agree with the arguments raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner. There is not bar in law against filing a subsequent circumstances and additional needs of minor, which a father is under a legal and moral obligation to provide. I have gone thrown the evidence in the