1 Reserved In the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow O.O.S.No.1/1989 (R.S.No.2-50) Sri Gopal Singh Visharad, aged about 42 years, son of Thakur Girdhari Singh, resident of Mohalla Sargdwar Ayodhya, Pargana Haveli Avadh, Tehsil Va Zila Faizabad -(dead ) Rajendra Singh aged about 46 years son of Sri Gopal Singh Visharad, at present resident of State Bank of India Branch Gonda—Amended vide court order dated 22.02.86. ….... Plaintiff. Versus 1. Zahoor Ahmad, aged about 68 years, son of not known, resident of Mohalla Bara Bazar-dead, City Ayodhya, Pargana Haveli Avadh, Tehsil Va Zila Faizabad, Shahar Ayodhya. 2. Haji Feku, aged about 65 years, son of not known, resident of Mohalla Terhi Bazar-dead, CityAyodhya, Pargana Haveli Avadh, Tehsil Va Zila Faizabad, Shahar Ayodhya. 3. Mohammad Faiq, aged about 45 years, son of not known, resident of Mohalla Terhi Bazar-dead, CityAyodhya, Pargana Haveli Avadh, Tehsil Va Zila Faizabad, Shahar Ayodhya. 4. Mohd.Shami Churiwala, aged about 45 years, son of not known, resident of Mohalla Ramganj-dead, City Ayodhya, Pargana Haveli Avadh, Tehsil Va Zila Faizabad, Shahar Ayodhya. 5. Mohammad Achchan Miyan, aged about 45 years, son of not known, resident of Mohalla katra-dead, CityAyodhya, Pargana Haveli Avadh, Tehsil Va Zila Faizabad, Shahar Ayodhya. 6. United Provinces, Uttar Pradesh, State, Lucknow –Amended under court order dated 21.02.50. 7. K.K.Nayyer,Deputy Commissioner, Faizabad –Amended vide court order dated 07.01.87. 8. Sri Markandey Singh,Additional City Magistrate, Faizabad— Amended under court order dated 07.01.87. 9. Sri Ram Kripal Singh, Superintendent of Police Faizabad— Amended under court's order dated 23.08.90. 10.Sunni Central Waqf Board Uttar Pradesh Lucknow, Moti Lal Bose Road, Police Station Kaiserbagh through Secretary. 11. Nirmohi Akhara Ayodhya, Haveli Avadh, Ayodhya, district Faizabad through Sarpanch Ram Swaroop Das, Upsarpanch Mahanth Bhaskerdas and Panch Rajaram Chandracharya. ------- …. Defendants Judgment delivered by Hon'ble Dharam Veer Sharma, J. The suit was initially filed by Sri Gopal Singh Visharad. After his death, his son Sri Rajendra Singh was substituted at his place. The plaintiff has sought following reliefs; Annexure-II Pages 30-59 It be declared that plaintiff is entitled for worship and offering prayers without any interruption of the deity of Lord Rama installed at Ram Janam Bhumi for which particulars are available at the foot of the plaint and further defendant nos.1 to 6 or their heirs and defendant nos. 7 to 9 and defendant no.10 be restrained not to interfere in the aforesaid right of the plaintiff. The defendants be restrained from removing the idols from the disputed place and be further restrained not to cause any hindrance in the entry of the plaintiff and also be prohibited not to close the entry door causing hindrance in the worship and Darshan of the plaintiff. The plaintiff be granted any other relief deemed fit by court along with costs. The details of the disputed property are as under:--East – Bhandar and platform of Janam Bhoomi. West—Parti land North—Sita Rasoi South—Parti land Plaintiff claims that he is the follower of Sanatan Dharm and