Text Practice Mode
typing test 63
created Jan 24th 2020, 13:33 by DeepakKumar1943849
1
372 words
8 completed
5
Rating visible after 3 or more votes
00:00
Two of the greatest conflicts that have been staged on the soil of our country seem to have almost as many aspects in common as they do aspects that differ. Both of the conflicts were a battle for the equality of people. Too, both of the conflicts started at about the same time in the history of our nation, around the middle of the nineteenth century. Thet ruce marking the official end of both of the conflicts was signed long ago; but all we have to do is too look around and we see that both are re-enacted in pageants, plays, and motion pictures; that both are rehashed in books, papers, magazines, and in discussion held in homes, offices, and every place else where people get together; and, as well, are refought-verbally of course-by the inevitable buffs who take a stand on either side.
The beginning and cause of the one that produced a great deal of blood-shed provided the impetus for the battle that did not, as far as we know, produce anything more than public demonstrations and numerous arguments. To be somewhat less than chivalrous, we have been told that both of these conflicts were started by women; part of our heritage is the knowledge that one of the conflicts was due, at least partly, to a book written by a woman and that the other one was instigated by a woman; however, to give credit where credit is due, we should say that the outgrowth of the first battle was led by a group of women. To return to chivalry, men agreed the cause of each conflict was noble.
The long-lasting battle between the men and women of this country, which originally had as its demand the right for women to vote side by side with the men in political elections, was finally ended with the assistance of several men, each of whom might have held a political office ans wished to be re-elected. The decision to concede voting rights was not a unanimous one, though, as a matter of fact, it was such an explosive situation at the time that each of the State was left to decide the matter as it best saw fit to do so.
The beginning and cause of the one that produced a great deal of blood-shed provided the impetus for the battle that did not, as far as we know, produce anything more than public demonstrations and numerous arguments. To be somewhat less than chivalrous, we have been told that both of these conflicts were started by women; part of our heritage is the knowledge that one of the conflicts was due, at least partly, to a book written by a woman and that the other one was instigated by a woman; however, to give credit where credit is due, we should say that the outgrowth of the first battle was led by a group of women. To return to chivalry, men agreed the cause of each conflict was noble.
The long-lasting battle between the men and women of this country, which originally had as its demand the right for women to vote side by side with the men in political elections, was finally ended with the assistance of several men, each of whom might have held a political office ans wished to be re-elected. The decision to concede voting rights was not a unanimous one, though, as a matter of fact, it was such an explosive situation at the time that each of the State was left to decide the matter as it best saw fit to do so.
saving score / loading statistics ...