(314) Yesterday when the matter was taken up, learned Advocate General, assisted by Additional Advocate General Mr. Neeraj Tripathi with two top police officers, including the one who led the SIT constituted by the Government of Uttar Pradesh, with the entire •• record of cases were present in the Court. We have heard Mr. Gopal Chaturvedi and Advocate General at considerable length and with their assistance gone through the material to which our attention was drawn. At the outset, learned Advocate General $ has informed the Court that First Information Report (FIR) was registered by mother of the prosecutrix, bearing Case Crime No. 0316, on 20 June 2017, for the offences under Sections 363, 366 IPC, against Awdhesh Tiwari and Shubham. During investigation, one Brijesh Yadav along with the other named accused was taken into custody, and offence under Section 376-D IPC and 3/4 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) was added. The investigation in this case got over long back and accused have been charge-sheeted, thereafter, enlarged on bail. This FIR was in connection with the alleged incident of kidnapping and gang rape occurred during 11 June and 20 June 2017. It is not in dispute that the prosecutrix is minor - aged about 17 years and has studied upto sixth standard. It appears, that according to the complaint and the prosecutrix, though they named Kuldeep Singh, MLA also in the said complaint, the police did not take down his name nor% did they allow her to make any allegations/complaint against him. In other words, her complaint against Kuldeep Singh, was, however, not registered. Consequently, prosecutrix made a complaint to the Chief Minister, in her own hand writing, of the incidents that had occurred on 4 June 2017 and between 11th and 20th June 2017, making allegation of rape, in particular against Kuldeep Singh, who allegedly committed rape on that day (04.06.2017). ?