Thereafter, the learned counsel for the appellant has drawn my attention to paragraph 21 which forms part of the cross-examination of P.W. 7 wherein he states in the last line that he had seen all the accused persons when they were produced in the court of Magistrate. Likewise, he has also referred to the statement in the court of P.W. 8 Manoj, the driver of the car wherein at paragraph-14 he says that he has identified the accused person at Mauganj Jail However before that he said that he was sitting in the vehicle of the T.I. in which some persons were sitting and at that time he says that the face of the accused persons were uncovered. My attention has also been drawn face of the accused persons were uncovered. My attention has also been drawn to the statement of P.W. 25 who was Sub-Inspector at the Thana which carried out the investigation in this case. Pargraph 7 which forms part of the cross-examination, he states that in the lock-up, the accused persons were held without their face being covered. Learned counsel for the appellant has sought to explain that the identification of P.W. 8 and P.W. 7 in the test identification parade lost its significance and reliability on account of their admitted position that they had earlier seen the appellant without their face being covered either before the court of Magistrate or sitting in the vehicle outside the court. In such a situation, it is submitted that the subsequent identification of the test identification parade and before the trial court is worthess. As regards the seizure of the money in this, the learned counsel for the appellant has drawn my attention to the statement of D.W. 2 which is the statement of Mohanlal. The police has seized 6,50,000 from the witness's house. He states that this money was kept with him as consideration amount to be paid to the seller of a particular land which he was seeking to buy. In fact, he says that on 2.1.2012 by an agreement, he had paid 50,000 to the seller the rest of the amount was to be paid on 28.4.2012 and the sale-deed executed. However, before that itself the police is said to have come and seized the amount from this witness.