Text Practice Mode
100 + Student Join M.P. High Court whatsapp group for your preparation as that- Test series, Typing Test series and many more activities in group so please send your name and your city name send on this number- 8109957050.
created Sep 8th 2021, 03:37 by MP ALL EXAM TARGET
1
353 words
14 completed
5
Rating visible after 3 or more votes
saving score / loading statistics ...
00:00
Join M.P. High Court whatsapp group for your preparation as that- Test series, Typing Test series and many more activities in group so please send your name and your city name send on this number- 8109957050. The Supreme Court restricted the application of the Right to Information Act, 2005 when it came to obtaining court records at the Gujarat High Court. A three-judge Bench held that citizens cannot file RTI requests to obtain copies of pleadings, judgments, documents, decrees or orders, deposition of the witnesses, etc. Instead, citizens must resort to using the procedure established by the Gujarat High Court Rules.The Court gave various directions to political parties both at the Central and State level to mandatorily upload on their websites the detailed information of candidates along with pending criminal cases against them, state reasons for selecting candidates and also why individuals who did not have any criminal antecedents could not be selected.This information has to be published on a local and national newspaper and on the official social media platforms of the political party. Political parties have to submit a report of the Election Commission within 72 hours of the selection of the said candidate. In an appeal before the Supreme Court, it was held that the order passed by the Madras High Court regarding extension of limitation period is not applicable to compute the period mentioned under Section 167(2) CrPC and shall not restrict the right to default bail of accused.A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that the amended Section 6 of the 2005 Act confers the status of coparcener on daughters born before or after amendment in the same manner as sons, with the same rights and liabilities. It also held that since the coparcener right is by birth, it is not mandatory that the father coparcener should be living as on November 9, 2005, when the amended provision came into force. Join M.P. High Court whatsapp group for your preparation as that- Test series, Typing Test series and many more activities in group so please send your name and your city name send on this number- 8109957050.
