The offense under section 201 of the Phadas is alleged against the accused that while traveling on 04.02.2017 at about 12 o'clock in the running train number 11015, the complainant Rakesh Mishra was carrying his wife Pooja's lady's purse containing a mobile phone, a gold ring, a chain. , out of the property stolen from the possession of the complainant out of cash 4280, by taking out the mobile money from the purse and throwing the purse in the moving train, destroyed the evidence. The accepted fact in the case is that the accused persons have been acquitted due to the agreement between the complainant and the accused under section 389 clause. The story of the prosecution in brief is as follows that on 04.02.2017, the complainant Rakesh was traveling in the train with his wife. After leaving the train, his wife saw that her lady's purse had been stolen by someone. During the investigation by the police, the statements of the witnesses were recorded and after other necessary investigation, the charge sheet has been presented in this court. Reading out the charges as per clause-1 to the accused, on being explained, the accused refused to commit the offense and sought trial. When the accused is tried under section 313, the accused has claimed to be innocent and falsely implicated and no evidence has been presented in the defense on behalf of the accused. The main questionable question from the case is whether the accused Rakesh Mishra of his wife Pooja's lady's purse containing a mobile phone, a gold ring, a chain, cash out of 4280 in the property stolen from the possession of the complainant at the date, time and place of the incident By taking out the mobile money from the purse and throwing the purse in the moving train, the evidence was destroyed. In this regard, it has been told by the complainant Rakesh that on 04.02.2017, Kushinagar Express was traveling from Mumbai to Vasti Uttar Pradesh with his wife and children. Then his wife's hand bag was stolen by someone, in which there was a gold ring, chain, mobile of Nokia company and Rs 4280. He had given copy of 01 application whose A to A part is under his signature. It has been told by Rameshvarma 02, the investigator of the case, that during the investigation of this case, a copy of the accused Shankar's copy of 03 was taken.