Text Practice Mode
SSC CHSL/CGL TYPING TEST 2024
created Nov 30th 2023, 01:05 by NetrapalSingh1
2
315 words
12 completed
4
Rating visible after 3 or more votes
saving score / loading statistics ...
00:00
The next fortnight will see world leaders, industrialists, activists, and indigenous peoples converge at
the 28th edition of the Conference of the Parties (COP). This annual affair is an attempt to inch ahead
on getting at least 190 countries, all members of the United Nations climate framework, to act on
weaning their economies off fossil fuels. The current goal is to make good on a collective
commitment made by countries in Paris, in 2015, to strive to hold global temperatures to no higher
than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels by the end of the century and definitely below 2°C. Despite
countries unanimously agreeing that humanity will collectively bear a huge price if these limits are
breached, and nearly all major economies framing grand national plans to show how they are doing
‘their bit’, the science says that instead of being cut 8% annually, emissions have grown 1.2% from
2021-22. At this rate, the world will warm 2.5-3°C by the end of the century. There have already been
86 instances just this year of global temperatures breaching the dreaded 1.5°C threshold.
In the nearly three decades of COP meetings, the major economies have agreed on three broad
principles. Countries that rapidly industrialised in the 20th century have disproportionately emitted
more carbon than their ‘fair share’ given the population sustained. Economic growth premised on
fossil fuel consumption, while cheaper per unit than renewable energy, spells disaster. And
developing countries and those with minimal industrial infrastructure today must be compensated
for adopting costlier, but cleaner, non-fossil fuel sources for growing their economies. There is also a
consensus that the countries already weathering climate disasters must be compensated and also
paid to bolster their infrastructure. However, getting all countries to actually act on these principles is
onerous given the mutual suspicion, the spirit of de-globalisation, and the fear of political reprisal
that heads of governments face within their constituencies.
the 28th edition of the Conference of the Parties (COP). This annual affair is an attempt to inch ahead
on getting at least 190 countries, all members of the United Nations climate framework, to act on
weaning their economies off fossil fuels. The current goal is to make good on a collective
commitment made by countries in Paris, in 2015, to strive to hold global temperatures to no higher
than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels by the end of the century and definitely below 2°C. Despite
countries unanimously agreeing that humanity will collectively bear a huge price if these limits are
breached, and nearly all major economies framing grand national plans to show how they are doing
‘their bit’, the science says that instead of being cut 8% annually, emissions have grown 1.2% from
2021-22. At this rate, the world will warm 2.5-3°C by the end of the century. There have already been
86 instances just this year of global temperatures breaching the dreaded 1.5°C threshold.
In the nearly three decades of COP meetings, the major economies have agreed on three broad
principles. Countries that rapidly industrialised in the 20th century have disproportionately emitted
more carbon than their ‘fair share’ given the population sustained. Economic growth premised on
fossil fuel consumption, while cheaper per unit than renewable energy, spells disaster. And
developing countries and those with minimal industrial infrastructure today must be compensated
for adopting costlier, but cleaner, non-fossil fuel sources for growing their economies. There is also a
consensus that the countries already weathering climate disasters must be compensated and also
paid to bolster their infrastructure. However, getting all countries to actually act on these principles is
onerous given the mutual suspicion, the spirit of de-globalisation, and the fear of political reprisal
that heads of governments face within their constituencies.
