The statutory period of six months for filing the second petition under Section 13 of the Act has been prescribed for providing an opportunity to parties to reconcile and withdraw petition for dissolution of marriage. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to advance arguments on the issue as to whether, statutory period prescribed under Section 13 of the Act is mandatory or directory and if directory whether could be dispensed with even by the High Court in exercise of its writ appellate jurisdiction. Thus this is not a case where there has been any obstruction to the stream of justice or there has been injustice to the parties which is required to be eradicated and this Court may grant equitable relief. Petition does not raise any question of general public importance. None of contingencies which may require this court to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 142 of the constitution has been brought to our notice in the case at hand. Thus in view of the above we do not find any justification to entertain this petition. It is accordingly dismissed. Marriage as a social institution is an affirmance of civilised social order where two individuals capable of entering into wedlock have pledged themselves to the institutional norms and values and promised to each other a cemented bond to sustain and maintain the marital obligation. It stands as an embodiment for continuance of the human race. Despite the pledge and promises on certain occasions individual incompatibilities attitudinal differences based upon egocentric perception of situations maladjustment phenomenon or propensity for non adjustment or refusal for adjustment gets eminently projected that compels both the spouses to take intolerable positions abandoning individual responsibility proclivity of asserting superiority complex betrayal of trust which is the cornerstone of life and sometimes a pervert sense of revenge a dreadful diet or sheer sense of envy bring the cracks in the relationship when either both the spouses or one of the spouses crave for dissolution of marriage freedom from the institutional and individual bond. The case at hand initiated by the husband for dissolution of marriage was viewed from a different perspective by the learned Family Court.